Not as nice as it looks

A Research Paper by Steven Barnett, published by British Journalism Review vol. 27 no. 3

If you believe the white paper on the BBC to be good news, you should read it more closely, says an academic who has.

Given the political turmoil of the past few months, it is tempting to see the future of the BBC as a sideshow while the full economic consequences of the Brexit vote unfold. It is therefore worth reminding ourselves that the new BBC charter – due to start on January 1, 2017 but still in the process of being resolved – will see the BBC through a centenary that many assumed it would never achieve. Having survived the depression, a world war, the rise and fall of several political parties, our accession to the EU and innumerable political crises over the past 90 years, this great British icon will at least endure a little longer. The question is, in what form?

Before the post-referendum game of cabinet musical chairs, David Cameron’s government published a white paper on the future of the BBC, which bore the clear imprint of his culture secretary John Whittingdale, a committed free marketeer who has never liked the size or scale of the BBC. In the run-up to its publication, there were carefully orchestrated leaks that suggested a brutal approach to the new charter. Could Strictly Come Dancing be justified as properly distinctive? Wasn’t the licence fee doomed? Perhaps the scale of technological change demanded only a five-year charter? Should the BBC be forced to move its 10 o’clock news to avoid clashing with ITV? Perhaps there should be a much broader instruction not to schedule competitively against commercial channels in peak time. And so on.

So when the white paper emerged in May 2016, there were sighs of relief. The licence fee was safe. The charter would be extended to 11 years to take it out of the electoral cycle. Such outlandish ideas as banning competitive scheduling had been quietly ditched (or, if you believe the spin, were never seriously considered). There was a widespread view that the BBC had emerged unscathed from the warmongering rhetoric that had accompanied Whittingdale’s appointment.

This extract has been reproduced here with kind permission, please visit British Journalism Review to read the rest of this article >>

 

.

Steven Barnett

About

Steven Barnett is Professor of Communications and a prominent writer and broadcaster who has been involved in policy analysis at the highest levels, both nationally and internationally, for the last 25 years. He has advised government ministers in the UK, has given evidence or served as an adviser on several parliamentary committees, has been called to give evidence to the European Parliament, and has been invited to speak at numerous national and international conferences.

Details

Date
30th September 2016
Published By
British Journalism Review vol. 27 no. 3
Share this article
Facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditlinkedinmailFacebooktwittergoogle_plusredditlinkedinmail

Leave a Comment

CAMRI | Not as nice as it looks - CAMRI
class="pirenko_portfolios-template-default single single-pirenko_portfolios postid-916 samba_theme samba_left_nav samba_left_align samba_responsive wpb-js-composer js-comp-ver-5.0 vc_responsive"